Wautoma, WI
Current Conditions
0:56 AM CST
Cloudy
Temperature
21°F
Dew Point
14°F
Humidity
74%
Wind
NE at 12 mph
Barometer
29.91 in. F
Visibility
10.00 mi.
Sunrise
07:22 a.m.
Sunset
04:57 p.m.
Morning Forecast (7:00am-12:00pm)
Temperatures will range from 18 to 22 degrees with partly cloudy skies. Winds will remain steady around 17 miles per hour from the northeast. No precipitation is expected.
7-Day Forecast
Sunday
23°F / 13°F
Partly Cloudy
Monday
33°F / 18°F
Partly Cloudy
Tuesday
30°F / 22°F
Partly Cloudy
Wednesday
29°F / 22°F
Snow
Thursday
29°F / 8°F
Partly Cloudy
Friday
9°F / 6°F
Mostly Cloudy
Saturday
24°F / 7°F
Light Snow
Detailed Short Term Forecast
Issued at 0:56 AM CST
Sunday...Temperatures will range from a high of 23 to a low of 13 degrees with partly cloudy skies. Winds will range between 1 and 19 miles per hour from the northeast. No precipitation is expected.
This Afternoon ...Temperatures will range from 23 to 17 degrees with mostly clear skies. Winds will range between 10 and 15 miles per hour from the northeast. No precipitation is expected.
This Evening ...Temperatures will range from 16 to 13 degrees with clear skies. Winds will range between 2 and 9 miles per hour from the northeast. No precipitation is expected.
Overnight ...Temperatures will range from 13 to 17 degrees with partly cloudy skies. Winds will range between 1 and 8 miles per hour from the south. No precipitation is expected.
Monday...Temperatures will range from a high of 33 to a low of 18 degrees with partly cloudy skies. Winds will range between 11 and 17 miles per hour from the northwest. Less than 1 inch of snow is possible.

Major study documents nutritional and food safety benefits of organic farming

July 23, 2014 | 0 comments

PULLMAN, WA

The largest study of its kind has found that organic foods and crops have a suite of advantages over their conventional counterparts, including more antioxidants and fewer, less frequent pesticide residues.

The study looked at an unprecedented 343 peer-reviewed publications comparing the nutritional quality and safety of organic and conventional plant-based foods, including fruits, vegetables and grains. The study team applied sophisticated meta-analysis techniques to quantify differences between organic and non-organic foods.

Quality of studies improves

"Science marches on," said Charles Benbrook, a Washington State University researcher and the lone American co-author of the paper, published in the British Journal of Nutrition. "Our team learned valuable lessons from earlier reviews on this topic, and we benefited from the team's remarkable breadth of scientific skills and experience."

Most of the publications covered in the study looked at crops grown in the same area on similar soils. This approach reduces other possible sources of variation in nutritional and safety parameters.

The research team found the quality and reliability of comparison studies has greatly improved in recent years, leading to the discovery of significant nutritional and food safety differences not detected in earlier studies. For example, the new study incorporates the results of a research project led by WSU's John Reganold that compared the nutritional and sensory quality of organic and conventional strawberries grown in California.

Responding to the new paper's results, Reganold said, "This is an impressive study, and its major nutritional findings are similar to those reported in our 2010 strawberry paper."

Organic plants produce more antioxidants

The British Journal of Nutrition study was led by scientists at Newcastle University in the United Kingdom, with Benbrook helping design the study, write the paper and review the scientific literature, particularly on studies in North and South America.

In general, the team found that organic crops have several nutritional benefits that stem from the way the crops are produced. A plant on a conventionally managed field will typically have access to high levels of synthetic nitrogen and will marshal the extra resources into producing sugars and starches. As a result, the harvested portion of the plant will often contain lower concentrations of other nutrients, including health-promoting antioxidants.

Without the synthetic chemical pesticides applied on conventional crops, organic plants tend to produce more phenols and polyphenols to defend against pest attacks and related injuries. In people, phenols and polyphenols can help prevent diseases triggered or promoted by oxidative damage, like coronary heart disease, stroke and certain cancers.

Overall, organic crops had 18-69 percent higher concentrations of antioxidant compounds. The team concludes that consumers who switch to organic fruit, vegetables and cereals would get 20 to 40 percent more antioxidants. That's the equivalent of about two extra portions of fruit and vegetables a day, with no increase in caloric intake.

10-100 times fewer pesticide residues

The researchers also found pesticide residues were three-four times more likely in conventional foods than organic ones, as organic farmers are not allowed to apply toxic, synthetic pesticides. While crops harvested from organically managed fields sometimes contain pesticide residues, the levels are usually 10-fold to 100-fold lower in organic food, compared to the corresponding, conventionally grown food.

"This study is telling a powerful story of how organic plant-based foods are nutritionally superior and deliver bona fide health benefits," said Benbrook.

In a surprising finding, the team concluded that conventional crops had roughly twice as much cadmium, a toxic heavy metal contaminant, as organic crops. The leading explanation is that certain fertilizers approved for use only on conventional farms somehow make cadmium more available to plant roots. A doubling of cadmium from food could push some individuals over safe daily intake levels.

Team surveys more and better studies

More than half the studies in the Newcastle analysis were not available to the research team that carried out a 2009 study commissioned by the UK Food Standards Agency. Another review published by a Stanford University team in 2011 failed to identify any significant clinical health benefits from consumption of organic food, but incorporated fewer than half the number of comparisons for most health-promoting nutrients.

"We benefited from a much larger and higher quality set of studies than our colleagues who carried out earlier reviews," said Carlo Leifert, a Newcastle University professor and the project leader.

The Newcastle study cost about $429,000 and was funded by the European Framework Programme 6, which is a research program of the European Union, and the Sheepdrove Trust, a private charity that supports research on sustainability, diversity and organic farming.

This site uses Facebook comments to make it easier for you to contribute. If you see a comment you would like to flag for spam or abuse, click the "x" in the upper right of it. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use.

Page Tools

Search

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement