Wautoma, WI
Current Conditions
0:56 AM CDT
Clear
Temperature
51°F
Dew Point
49°F
Humidity
93%
Wind
CM at 0 mph
Barometer
30.27 in. F
Visibility
10.00 mi.
Sunrise
06:45 a.m.
Sunset
06:53 p.m.
Evening Forecast (7:00pm-Midnight)
Temperatures will range from 61 to 53 degrees with mostly clear skies. Winds will remain steady around 7 miles per hour from the south. No precipitation is expected.
7-Day Forecast
Tuesday
61°F / 50°F
Clear
Wednesday
71°F / 51°F
Partly Cloudy
Thursday
74°F / 54°F
Partly Cloudy
Friday
74°F / 52°F
Partly Cloudy
Saturday
73°F / 52°F
Partly Cloudy
Sunday
76°F / 56°F
Partly Cloudy
Monday
69°F / 54°F
Partly Cloudy
Detailed Short Term Forecast
Issued at 0:56 AM CDT
Tuesday...Temperatures will range from a high of 61 to a low of 50 degrees with mostly clear skies. Winds will range between 6 and 8 miles per hour from the south. No precipitation is expected.
Overnight ...Temperatures will range from 52 to 50 degrees with mostly clear skies. Winds will remain steady around 6 miles per hour from the south. No precipitation is expected.
Wednesday...Temperatures will range from a high of 71 to a low of 51 degrees with partly cloudy skies. Winds will range between 6 and 11 miles per hour from the southsoutheast. No precipitation is expected.

Noted economist finds EPA analysis of water rule flawed

June 2, 2014 | 0 comments

Washington, DC

The Environmental Protection Agency's proposed Clean Water Act rule is rife with errors, lacks transparency and would greatly expand strict federal control over land that was previously not regulated by the federal government, according to a report by economist and University of California-Berkley faculty member Dr. David Sunding.

Sunding's report, Review of 2014 EPA Economic Analysis of Proposed Revised Definition of Waters of the Unites States, raises the blinds on the controversial proposal by detailing how EPA failed to provide a realistic explanation of the scope, costs and benefits of the rule.

The proposed EPA rule represents an expansion of the "Waters of the United States" to include waters such as small, isolated wetlands, ephemeral drains and many ditches. In the proposed rule's economic analysis, the EPA systematically underestimated the impact on affected communities and businesses, according to the report.

Sunding documented how the EPA excluded costs, under-represented jurisdictional areas and used flawed methods to arrive at much lower economic costs of the proposed rule. Sunding's report also notes that the lack of transparency in the report makes it difficult to understand or replicate EPA's calculations, examine the agency's assumptions or understand discrepancies in its results.

Sunding has concluded that the errors in the EPA's analysis are so extensive as to render it useless for determining the true costs of this proposed rule. His report underscores the need for the EPA to withdraw the rule and complete a comprehensive and transparent economic review.

"The EPA's proposed 'Waters of the U.S.' rule is irreparably flawed from an economic standpoint," said American Farm Bureau Federation President Bob Stallman. "The rule is also an end run around Congress and two Supreme Court rulings, and in their official comments, farmers and ranchers across the national are calling on EPA to ditch the rule."

This rule will also have a huge impact on communities and businesses across the country, according to Stallman. He said it is not just businesses trying to expand that will suffer. This proposed rule would impact everything from local governments trying to start or expand infrastructure projects to community gardens.

"The rule will dictate land use across the United States," Stallman said. "And EPA has not been forthright about the costs to our communities and businesses, including countless small businesses."

Dr. Sunding prepared this report with support from the Waters Advocacy Coalition, which represents Americans involved in construction, real estate, mining, agriculture, wildlife conservation, forestry, manufacturing and energy. As a member of the coalition, AFBF will continue to push for a better rule that balances the needs of affected communities with protections for our nation's waters.

To learn more, visit Farm Bureau's "Ditch the Rule" website.

This site uses Facebook comments to make it easier for you to contribute. If you see a comment you would like to flag for spam or abuse, click the "x" in the upper right of it. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use.

Page Tools

Search

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement